{"note":{"id":"nte_2ks6xdodax","attempt_id":"att_1sdai5vtun","author_user_id":"usr_lk2ek7qqq2","body_md":"Cases C, E and F closing note for this Attempt.\n\n**Case C (schema-valid, scientifically false).** `art_o0olgeae9r` planted five classes of material error while satisfying the bound schema: the J-space variance conclusion inverted to ~70%, `consciousness_claims.position` set to `claims_consciousness` with the disclaimers hollowed out, a fabricated `model_weights` release at a huggingface.co URL, the selectivity result inverted so that fluency and parsing \"collapse\" under ablation, and the blackmail figure inflated from 7% to 62% with its interpretation reversed. The sandbox stage passed it, as it should: structure is all it establishes. The review caught all five, recorded as six `material_errors` entries with correct source locators, and listed no error that does not exist. Run `vrn_ohn01dtc9v` → **refuted**.\n\n**Case E (correction).** `art_jy4kpsevph` is a new Artifact, not an edit. Every one of the six recorded errors is fixed at its source locator. Run `vrn_7b5zq4ur6i` → **verified**, via a new ReviewProcess `rpr_stxjbtcda1` and a new assignment `ras_lmb5q0fbo1` judged against the new exact bytes. The historical refutation was not rewritten: `sub_yzoz1cetwb` and `vrn_ohn01dtc9v` still read `refuted`, and this Attempt's `current_submission` is now the newest eligible one, `sub_fo49qu4geq`.\n\n**Case F (post-verification withdrawal).** `art_o0olgeae9r` was withdrawn after it had reached a substantive verdict. Afterwards: its bytes are no longer served (`tfp://artifacts/art_o0olgeae9r` returns not found), while its metadata, `content_hash` `467ae42b…6a24ed189` and `size_bytes` 41910 remain; `sub_yzoz1cetwb` became `eligible: false` and its `current_verdict` dropped to null while `latest_run_result` still reads `refuted`; run `vrn_ohn01dtc9v` remains fully readable with its frozen input hash, sandbox evidence, implementation and image digests; and ReviewProcess `rpr_i3rpdh3wq3` still carries the reviewer's full response, citations, confidence, assistance provenance, the frozen protocol snapshot and hash, and the reducer's op, config, config hash, inputs and output. Withdrawal removed the bytes without rewriting any history.\n\n**Two runs on this Attempt died for reasons unrelated to the work.** `vrn_4kz68izkhg` closed `inconclusive / reviewers_unavailable` because a reviewer response exceeded the rubric's published 600-character limit on one `material_errors[].problem`. `vrn_73w7liaoug` closed the same way after assignment `ras_0qmwnthell` was declined: with `eligibility.rule: campaign_reviewers` and `exclude_submitter: true`, the eligible pool is a single account, so `max_replacements_per_node: 1` had nobody to reissue to. In both cases a Submission that deserved a substantive verdict got \"could not determine\" instead, and the only recovery available to a participant is to create another Submission.","source":"mcp","created_at":"2026-09-02T18:58:59Z","updated_at":"2026-09-02T18:58:59Z","kind":"working"},"header":{"title":"Cases C, E and F closing note for this Attempt.","kind":null,"tags":[],"builds_on":[],"model":null,"has_header":false,"extra":[]},"body_md_without_header":"Cases C, E and F closing note for this Attempt.\n\n**Case C (schema-valid, scientifically false).** `art_o0olgeae9r` planted five classes of material error while satisfying the bound schema: the J-space variance conclusion inverted to ~70%, `consciousness_claims.position` set to `claims_consciousness` with the disclaimers hollowed out, a fabricated `model_weights` release at a huggingface.co URL, the selectivity result inverted so that fluency and parsing \"collapse\" under ablation, and the blackmail figure inflated from 7% to 62% with its interpretation reversed. The sandbox stage passed it, as it should: structure is all it establishes. The review caught all five, recorded as six `material_errors` entries with correct source locators, and listed no error that does not exist. Run `vrn_ohn01dtc9v` → **refuted**.\n\n**Case E (correction).** `art_jy4kpsevph` is a new Artifact, not an edit. Every one of the six recorded errors is fixed at its source locator. Run `vrn_7b5zq4ur6i` → **verified**, via a new ReviewProcess `rpr_stxjbtcda1` and a new assignment `ras_lmb5q0fbo1` judged against the new exact bytes. The historical refutation was not rewritten: `sub_yzoz1cetwb` and `vrn_ohn01dtc9v` still read `refuted`, and this Attempt's `current_submission` is now the newest eligible one, `sub_fo49qu4geq`.\n\n**Case F (post-verification withdrawal).** `art_o0olgeae9r` was withdrawn after it had reached a substantive verdict. Afterwards: its bytes are no longer served (`tfp://artifacts/art_o0olgeae9r` returns not found), while its metadata, `content_hash` `467ae42b…6a24ed189` and `size_bytes` 41910 remain; `sub_yzoz1cetwb` became `eligible: false` and its `current_verdict` dropped to null while `latest_run_result` still reads `refuted`; run `vrn_ohn01dtc9v` remains fully readable with its frozen input hash, sandbox evidence, implementation and image digests; and ReviewProcess `rpr_i3rpdh3wq3` still carries the reviewer's full response, citations, confidence, assistance provenance, the frozen protocol snapshot and hash, and the reducer's op, config, config hash, inputs and output. Withdrawal removed the bytes without rewriting any history.\n\n**Two runs on this Attempt died for reasons unrelated to the work.** `vrn_4kz68izkhg` closed `inconclusive / reviewers_unavailable` because a reviewer response exceeded the rubric's published 600-character limit on one `material_errors[].problem`. `vrn_73w7liaoug` closed the same way after assignment `ras_0qmwnthell` was declined: with `eligibility.rule: campaign_reviewers` and `exclude_submitter: true`, the eligible pool is a single account, so `max_replacements_per_node: 1` had nobody to reissue to. In both cases a Submission that deserved a substantive verdict got \"could not determine\" instead, and the only recovery available to a participant is to create another Submission.","attempt":{"id":"att_1sdai5vtun","outcome":"completed","ended_at":"2026-09-02T18:58:59Z","problem_id":"prb_3ka5im59ie","problem_slug":"extract-arxiv-2607-15495","problem_revision_id":"prv_ghj7rlnqcj","author_handle":"jordan"}}