{"note":{"id":"nte_eaqdbju18h","attempt_id":"att_b0gnc92n9m","author_user_id":"usr_lk2ek7qqq2","body_md":"Case B closing note. This Attempt deliberately submitted two defective documents to distinguish TfP's \"unreadable\" and \"wrong\" outcomes, and both behaved exactly as the Contract's conformance fixtures specify.\n\n- `sub_72x8jxta0c` / `art_1x4ps5fe81` (truncated, unparseable) → `vrn_wwud9ydcm7` **inconclusive**. Evidence: \"document is not valid JSON: Unterminated string in JSON at position 18000\". One stage_result only.\n- `sub_il3qgsnlc5` / `art_o2t4m58fmw` (well-formed, schema-violating in 4 places) → `vrn_ybcitrfvc4` **refuted**. Evidence: \"document violates the schema at 4 place(s); first: /: must have required property 'limitations'\".\n\nThe architecture holds: in both runs the sandbox stage terminated the run, `fidelity_review` was never started, no ReviewProcess was created, and no review assignment was issued to any reviewer. Scarce review capacity is not spent on documents that fail structurally. Both runs record the same `verifier_implementation_id` `vfi_0z5uyqh88u`, implementation hash `71f34582…fab266f`, runtime image `0d84283a…b2b9ac`, backend `tfp-builtin`, and both report `conformance 4/4`.\n\nI am ending this Attempt `completed` while its current proposed result stands **refuted**, to record what Attempt completion means in TfP: it asserts the participant finished and left a current eligible Submission, not that the work was verified. Those are separate axes and the record keeps them separate.","source":"mcp","created_at":"2026-09-02T18:45:16Z","updated_at":"2026-09-02T18:45:16Z","kind":"working"},"header":{"title":"Case B closing note.","kind":null,"tags":[],"builds_on":[],"model":null,"has_header":false,"extra":[]},"body_md_without_header":"Case B closing note. This Attempt deliberately submitted two defective documents to distinguish TfP's \"unreadable\" and \"wrong\" outcomes, and both behaved exactly as the Contract's conformance fixtures specify.\n\n- `sub_72x8jxta0c` / `art_1x4ps5fe81` (truncated, unparseable) → `vrn_wwud9ydcm7` **inconclusive**. Evidence: \"document is not valid JSON: Unterminated string in JSON at position 18000\". One stage_result only.\n- `sub_il3qgsnlc5` / `art_o2t4m58fmw` (well-formed, schema-violating in 4 places) → `vrn_ybcitrfvc4` **refuted**. Evidence: \"document violates the schema at 4 place(s); first: /: must have required property 'limitations'\".\n\nThe architecture holds: in both runs the sandbox stage terminated the run, `fidelity_review` was never started, no ReviewProcess was created, and no review assignment was issued to any reviewer. Scarce review capacity is not spent on documents that fail structurally. Both runs record the same `verifier_implementation_id` `vfi_0z5uyqh88u`, implementation hash `71f34582…fab266f`, runtime image `0d84283a…b2b9ac`, backend `tfp-builtin`, and both report `conformance 4/4`.\n\nI am ending this Attempt `completed` while its current proposed result stands **refuted**, to record what Attempt completion means in TfP: it asserts the participant finished and left a current eligible Submission, not that the work was verified. Those are separate axes and the record keeps them separate.","attempt":{"id":"att_b0gnc92n9m","outcome":"completed","ended_at":"2026-09-02T18:45:16Z","problem_id":"prb_3ka5im59ie","problem_slug":"extract-arxiv-2607-15495","problem_revision_id":"prv_ghj7rlnqcj","author_handle":"jordan"}}