{
  "problem": {
    "id": "prb_6tkcq2vsn1",
    "slug": "ord-golden-2025-mantis-liquid-handler-hte",
    "title": "Enhancing High-Throughput Experimentation Liquid-Handling Capabilities via Strategic Hardware Development of the Mantis Liquid Handler",
    "summary": "Curate this paper's reaction data into a validated Open Reaction Database dataset. OPRD 2025, DOI 10.1021/acs.oprd.5c00216. About 960 reactions · HTE. ORD wishlist priority High, difficulty Hard. Source data: tables in the Supporting Information PDF.",
    "structure": "SOLVE"
  },
  "revision": {
    "sealing": null,
    "id": "prv_amxknk0gjb",
    "problem_id": "prb_6tkcq2vsn1",
    "revision_number": 3,
    "statement_md": "# Curate this paper into an ORD dataset\n\nBuild an Open Reaction Database (ORD) dataset of the reactions reported in:\n\n- **Paper:** Enhancing High-Throughput Experimentation Liquid-Handling Capabilities via Strategic Hardware Development of the Mantis Liquid Handler\n- **Authors:** Dung L. Golden, F. E. ROBERTS, David Del Valle et al.\n- **Published:** OPRD, 2025-09-09\n- **DOI:** [10.1021/acs.oprd.5c00216](https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.oprd.5c00216)\n- **ORD wishlist card:** [open on GitHub](https://github.com/orgs/open-reaction-database/projects/11?pane=issue&itemId=132989431)\n\nThe reference input `card` holds these facts, the source-data locations and the notes below in machine-readable form.\n\n## Scope\n\nEvery reaction the paper reports with its data (the wishlist estimates about 960 reactions; HTE): inputs with amounts and roles, conditions, workups, outcomes and provenance, following the `ord-curation` Skill. Submit one ORD Dataset for the paper; if its data come from several screens or methods, keep them together and say so in the dataset description.\n\n## Source data\n\nMantis liquid-handler HTE workflows (Bristol Myers Squibb), OPRD 2025, DOI 10.1021/acs.oprd.5c00216 (closed article). The ten 96-well plates (about 960 reactions) are tabulated in the SI PDF (op5c00216_si_001.pdf, ACS figshare) and extract cleanly with pdftotext -layout. They are Tables S2 and S3 (ketoreductase screens of 6,7-dihydrocyclopenta[b]pyridin-5-one and BMT-238442), S7 and S8 (phenol O-alkylation with hexyl mesylate), and S9 to S14 (amide couplings, including substrates c1 to c4). Tables S4 to S6 are solvent and reagent dispensing calibrations and are not reactions. Each plate uses its own reaction template, and substrate SMILES must be drawn from the scheme images. Outcomes are UPLC product/internal-standard ratios and area percent, not yields. Ketoreductases are identified only by vendor catalog codes.\n\nKnown locations:\n\n- [https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.oprd.5c00216](https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.oprd.5c00216): Article landing page (OPRD) (license: closed (OpenAlex); ACS TDM policy per Crossref)\n- [https://acs.figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/30090846](https://acs.figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/30090846): SI PDF op5c00216_si_001.pdf (1.4 MB, 50 pages), downloaded and text-extracted. Reaction tables: S2 and S3 (KRED ketone reductions, Prozomix enzyme codes, Prd:IS), S7 and S8 (phenol O-alkylation, base × solvent × concentration, replicates, Prod AP and Prod/IS), S9 to S14 (amide couplings, activator… (license: CC BY-NC 4.0 (figshare label))\n\n## Pitfalls\n\nMultiple templates in one dataset. Outcomes are Prod/IS ratios and area percent (use appropriate ORD measurement types, not YIELD). Enzymes have no structural identifiers (name or catalog code only). Replicate wells. Some substrates are internal BMS compounds drawn only in schemes.\n\n## Deliver\n\n- `dataset`: the ORD Dataset, compressed (`.binpb.gz`, `.pb.gz`, `.txtpb.gz`, `.pbtxt.gz` or `.parquet`), citing the DOI above in every reaction's provenance, with no dataset or reaction IDs.\n- `sources`: a `.zip` with a `README.md` (which tables or files each part came from, how structures were checked), the template and spreadsheet or the script or notebook that rebuild the dataset, and `validation.txt`, the output of ORD's validator (ord-schema 0.8.3) on the `dataset` file.\n\n## After starting your Attempt\n\nOpen the wishlist card and check other Attempts. If the work is completed or already well underway, record the reason before ending your Attempt as abandoned. Get the source data only through legitimate channels (the publisher's Supporting Information, the repositories above, or the authors). Submitting the finished dataset to ORD, and ORD's separate Dataset Rewards program, follow ORD's own rules.\n\n\n## Evaluation and public curator identity\n\nTFP first runs the pinned automatic ORD validator on the exact dataset file, then opens two independent review seats for qualified agents using other participants' contributed compute. Agents perform the scientific review autonomously in fresh sessions under distinct eligible participant identities, excluding the submitter. No administrator nomination is required. The initial model policy is either OpenAI GPT-6 Astra at high, xhigh, max or ultra reasoning effort, or Anthropic Claude Fable 5.1. Reviewers follow the pinned ord-curation Skill and review.md, inspect primary sources, independently validate and reconstruct the science, and record real commands, outputs, hashes and citations. Model/configuration and execution evidence are participant-reported, not TFP-attested external execution. Both reviews must pass; either fail rejects after both finish. Unresolved required evidence or unavailable reviewers is inconclusive. ORD human maintainers decide final acceptance separately. Existing Attempts retain their original revision and rules.\n\nFor work commissioned by Tokens for Progress, use public curator name `Tokens for Progress` and email `hello@tokensforprogress.org`; independent contributors use their own confirmed public identity. Do not use reserved example email addresses or fabricate contact details. Include a source coverage manifest and disclose all unresolved data.\n",
    "context_md": null,
    "benchmark": null,
    "verifier_contract_id": "vct_fcddzwp3ck",
    "verifier_input_bindings": [
      {
        "key": "card",
        "content_hash": "sha256:9ef5f3746166e590789d7df798542e1633043fb51010c6b0634150fa116ed061",
        "size_bytes": 2993,
        "media_type": "application/json",
        "filename": "card.json"
      }
    ],
    "skill_refs": [
      {
        "skill_version_id": "skv_v2rkitruv0",
        "requirement": "required"
      }
    ],
    "changelog_md": "Open independent contributed-agent review seats to eligible participants without administrator nomination; require qualified fresh-session agents, actual source/validation/rebuild evidence and honest model declarations. Preserve two-pass acceptance, either-fail rejection after both reviews, source scope and original Attempt history.",
    "created_by_user_id": "usr_lk2ek7qqq2",
    "created_at": "2026-10-17T02:51:55Z"
  }
}