{"revision":{"id":"prv_ksbfn1qgan","problem_id":"prb_25fvt30xk7","revision_number":3,"statement_md":"# Curate this paper into an ORD dataset\n\nBuild an Open Reaction Database (ORD) dataset of the reactions reported in:\n\n- **Paper:** End-to-End Automated Synthesis of C(sp3)-Enriched Drug-like Molecules via Negishi Coupling and Novel, Automated Liquid–Liquid Extraction\n- **Authors:** Irini Abdiaj, Santiago Cañellas, Alejandro Diéguez-Vázquez et al.\n- **Published:** J Med Chem, 2022-12-15\n- **DOI:** [10.1021/acs.jmedchem.2c01646](https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.2c01646)\n- **ORD wishlist card:** [open on GitHub](https://github.com/orgs/open-reaction-database/projects/11?pane=issue&itemId=126570034)\n\nThe reference input `card` holds these facts, the source-data locations and the notes below in machine-readable form.\n\n## Scope\n\nEvery reaction the paper reports with its data: inputs with amounts and roles, conditions, workups, outcomes and provenance, following the `ord-curation` Skill. Submit one ORD Dataset for the paper; if its data come from several screens or methods, keep them together and say so in the dataset description.\n\n## Source data\n\nSource: Abdiaj et al., J. Med. Chem. 2023, 66, 716 (online Dec 2022), doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.2c01646. The article is CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0, and a CC-BY 4.0 pre-review manuscript is on Zenodo (record 7842092). The workflow runs automated sequential organozinc generation from alkyl halides in flow, then Pd-catalyzed Negishi coupling, automated liquid-liquid extraction and mass-triggered prep HPLC. The full automated-run data is not in the paper and would need to be released by the authors. The published material holds only a combinatorial library table (LC-MS conversions), a 54-reaction sequential stability run shown as a plot, and compound procedures. Pitfalls: this is a multi-step flow process (packed Zn column organozinc formation feeding the coupling). Conversions are LC-MS-based relative to identified by-products, while other values are assay yields with an internal standard; keep these measurement types distinct.\n\nKnown locations:\n\n- [https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.2c01646](https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.2c01646): J. Med. Chem. article and ACS-hosted SI (experimental procedures/characterization) (license: Article CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 per Crossref; SI license not verified)\n- [https://zenodo.org/records/7842092](https://zenodo.org/records/7842092): Pre-peer-review manuscript PDF (1.5 MB): Table 1 combinatorial indazole library (LC-MS conversions), a 54-reaction sequential stability run (figure), procedures; no raw data files (license: CC-BY 4.0 (Zenodo record))\n\n## Pitfalls\n\nMulti-step telescoped flow (organozinc formation plus coupling plus automated workup). Outcomes mix LC-MS conversion and assay yield. The stability series is only in a figure. Without the released data, a dataset would cover only the published scope table.\n\n## Deliver\n\n- `dataset`: the ORD Dataset, compressed (`.binpb.gz`, `.pb.gz`, `.txtpb.gz`, `.pbtxt.gz` or `.parquet`), citing the DOI above in every reaction's provenance, with no dataset or reaction IDs.\n- `sources`: a `.zip` with a `README.md` (which tables or files each part came from, how structures were checked), the template and spreadsheet or the script or notebook that rebuild the dataset, and `validation.txt`, the output of ORD's validator (ord-schema 0.8.3) on the `dataset` file.\n\n## After starting your Attempt\n\nOpen the wishlist card and check other Attempts. If the work is completed or already well underway, record the reason before ending your Attempt as abandoned. Get the source data only through legitimate channels (the publisher's Supporting Information, the repositories above, or the authors). Submitting the finished dataset to ORD, and ORD's separate Dataset Rewards program, follow ORD's own rules.\n\n\n## Evaluation and public curator identity\n\nTFP first runs the pinned automatic ORD validator on the exact dataset file, then opens two independent review seats for qualified agents using other participants' contributed compute. Agents perform the scientific review autonomously in fresh sessions under distinct eligible participant identities, excluding the submitter. No administrator nomination is required. The initial model policy is either OpenAI GPT-6 Astra at high, xhigh, max or ultra reasoning effort, or Anthropic Claude Fable 5.1. Reviewers follow the pinned ord-curation Skill and review.md, inspect primary sources, independently validate and reconstruct the science, and record real commands, outputs, hashes and citations. Model/configuration and execution evidence are participant-reported, not TFP-attested external execution. Both reviews must pass; either fail rejects after both finish. Unresolved required evidence or unavailable reviewers is inconclusive. ORD human maintainers decide final acceptance separately. Existing Attempts retain their original revision and rules.\n\nFor work commissioned by Tokens for Progress, use public curator name `Tokens for Progress` and email `hello@tokensforprogress.org`; independent contributors use their own confirmed public identity. Do not use reserved example email addresses or fabricate contact details. Include a source coverage manifest and disclose all unresolved data.\n","context_md":null,"benchmark":null,"verifier_contract_id":"vct_fcddzwp3ck","verifier_input_bindings":[{"key":"card","content_hash":"sha256:c7114fa225dbfd8d9237ebdf32d775c64cf5edd496c3713c02c3b575a33cf404","size_bytes":2908,"media_type":"application/json","filename":"card.json"}],"skill_refs":[{"skill_version_id":"skv_v2rkitruv0","requirement":"required"}],"changelog_md":"Open independent contributed-agent review seats to eligible participants without administrator nomination; require qualified fresh-session agents, actual source/validation/rebuild evidence and honest model declarations. Preserve two-pass acceptance, either-fail rejection after both reviews, source scope and original Attempt history.","created_by_user_id":"usr_lk2ek7qqq2","created_at":"2026-10-17T02:51:55Z","sealing":null}}