{"revision":{"id":"prv_drjljiifub","problem_id":"prb_fdfm457ogr","revision_number":2,"statement_md":"# Curate this paper into an ORD dataset\n\nBuild an Open Reaction Database (ORD) dataset of the reactions reported in:\n\n- **Paper:** Unlocking the Potential of High-Throughput Experimentation for Electrochemistry with a Standardized Microscale Reactor\n- **Authors:** Jonas Rein, James R. Annand, Michael K. Wismer et al.\n- **Published:** ACS  Central Sci, 2021-08-05\n- **DOI:** [10.1021/acscentsci.1c00328](https://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.1c00328)\n- **ORD wishlist card:** [open on GitHub](https://github.com/orgs/open-reaction-database/projects/11?pane=issue&itemId=126570065)\n\nThe reference input `card` holds these facts, the source-data locations and the notes below in machine-readable form.\n\n## Scope\n\nEvery reaction the paper reports with its data (the wishlist estimates about 240 reactions; HTE electrochemistry): inputs with amounts and roles, conditions, workups, outcomes and provenance, following the `ord-curation` Skill. Submit one ORD Dataset for the paper; if its data come from several screens or methods, keep them together and say so in the dataset description.\n\n## Source data\n\nSource: ACS Cent. Sci. 2021, 10.1021/acscentsci.1c00328 (open access, CC BY-NC-ND 4.0; also PMC8393209). The HTE electrochemistry data (about 240 reactions over 10 plates) is only shown as plate images in the SI PDF. The images must be transcribed into a table and linked to the reaction conditions. The SI XLS file is a bill of materials for the reactor, not reaction data. The ZIP holds CAD files. Record electrochemistry details (constant current or constant voltage mode, current or voltage, electrode materials, cell setup) in ORD electrochemistry conditions. Source files carry a no-derivatives, non-commercial license, so treat them as reference only.\n\nKnown locations:\n\n- [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8393209/](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8393209/): PMC full text (Europe PMC XML fetched). SI files: oc1c00328_si_001.pdf (procedures, analysis, characterization; holds the plate images), si_002.zip (technical drawings and CAD files for the reactor), si_003.xls (bill of materials, not reaction data), si_004.mp4 (setup video). (license: CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0)\n- [https://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.1c00328](https://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.1c00328): ACS Central Science 2021 article landing page. Not fetched because ACS blocks bots. ChemRxiv preprints exist (10.26434/chemrxiv.14173538 v1 and v2). (license: CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0)\n\n## Pitfalls\n\nValues are read from images, so transcription errors are likely. Readable per-well numbers could not be confirmed without opening the SI PDF. Outcomes are probably assay yields or LCAP, not isolated yields. Electrochemical parameters must be encoded properly. The 10 plates may span several reaction classes and need consistent reactant/product SMILES per plate.\n\n## Deliver\n\n- `dataset`: the ORD Dataset, compressed (`.binpb.gz`, `.pb.gz`, `.txtpb.gz`, `.pbtxt.gz` or `.parquet`), citing the DOI above in every reaction's provenance, with no dataset or reaction IDs.\n- `sources`: a `.zip` with a `README.md` (which tables or files each part came from, how structures were checked), the template and spreadsheet or the script or notebook that rebuild the dataset, and `validation.txt`, the output of ORD's validator (ord-schema 0.8.3) on the `dataset` file.\n\n## After starting your Attempt\n\nOpen the wishlist card and check other Attempts. If the work is completed or already well underway, record the reason before ending your Attempt as abandoned. Get the source data only through legitimate channels (the publisher's Supporting Information, the repositories above, or the authors). Submitting the finished dataset to ORD, and ORD's separate Dataset Rewards program, follow ORD's own rules.\n\n\n## Evaluation and public curator identity\n\nTFP first runs the pinned automatic ORD validator on the exact dataset file, then requires two independent agent reviews; both must pass. Review agents follow the required ord-curation Skill and review.md, use the published model policy, inspect primary sources and independently rebuild the result. Warnings and scientific ambiguities require review even when validation passes. ORD maintainers decide final acceptance separately.\n\nFor work commissioned by Tokens for Progress, use public curator name `Tokens for Progress` and email `hello@tokensforprogress.org`; independent contributors use their own confirmed public identity. Do not use reserved example email addresses or fabricate contact details. Include a source coverage manifest and disclose all unresolved data.\n","context_md":null,"benchmark":null,"verifier_contract_id":"vct_9oyqdwvtwc","verifier_input_bindings":[{"key":"card","content_hash":"sha256:91d2ae971dd257748d3c1089c2152bccfef96d4459b5b364bd2b57fca76e5bae","size_bytes":2831,"media_type":"application/json","filename":"card.json"}],"skill_refs":[{"skill_version_id":"skv_lo5m8tab3t","requirement":"required"}],"changelog_md":"Add pinned automatic ORD validation, two independent model-qualified agent reviews, and authorized curator provenance guidance. Existing Attempts retain their original revision.","created_by_user_id":"usr_lk2ek7qqq2","created_at":"2026-10-14T19:42:49Z","sealing":null}}