{"revision":{"id":"prv_jdgnea55j5","problem_id":"prb_lqfgwysh1m","revision_number":3,"statement_md":"# Curate this paper into an ORD dataset\n\nBuild an Open Reaction Database (ORD) dataset of the reactions reported in:\n\n- **Paper:** Microscale High-Throughput Experimentation as an Enabling Technology in Drug Discovery: Application in the Discovery of (Piperidinyl)pyridinyl-1H-benzimidazole Diacylglycerol Acyltransferase 1 Inhibitors\n- **Authors:** Tim Cernak, Nathan J. Gesmundo, Kevin D. Dykstra et al.\n- **Published:** J Med Chem, 2017-03-02\n- **DOI:** [10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b01543](https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b01543)\n- **ORD wishlist card:** [open on GitHub](https://github.com/orgs/open-reaction-database/projects/11?pane=issue&itemId=126570082)\n\nThe reference input `card` holds these facts, the source-data locations and the notes below in machine-readable form.\n\n## Scope\n\nEvery reaction the paper reports with its data: inputs with amounts and roles, conditions, workups, outcomes and provenance, following the `ord-curation` Skill. Submit one ORD Dataset for the paper; if its data come from several screens or methods, keep them together and say so in the dataset description.\n\n## Source data\n\nMicroscale (about 1 mg, glass microvial) high-throughput experimentation used to solve a difficult SNAr step during discovery of (piperidinyl)pyridinyl-1H-benzimidazole DGAT1 inhibitors, from Cernak et al., J. Med. Chem. 2017 (doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b01543). The screening data is expected in the article figures and ACS Supporting Information; its format (numeric tables vs heat maps) has not been confirmed, and the number of reactions is not recorded. The 'green' open-access copy listed by OpenAlex is a BindingDB affinity record, not a copy of the paper or its reaction data. Check the SI before starting. The ORD Dataset must cite the paper DOI.\n\nKnown locations:\n\n- [https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b01543](https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b01543): J. Med. Chem. 2017 article and SI (ACS site returned a bot challenge) (license: ACS, closed access)\n- [https://www.bindingdb.org/entry/50000929](https://www.bindingdb.org/entry/50000929): BindingDB entry (DGAT1 binding affinities, CC BY 3.0 US). This is the OpenAlex 'green OA' location; it is not reaction data (license: CC-BY-3.0-US (BindingDB))\n\n## Pitfalls\n\nData format and size unverified. HTE results from this era are often shown as LC-area heat maps, which may give only relative or qualitative outcomes. Library-synthesis products may lack reported yields.\n\n## Deliver\n\n- `dataset`: the ORD Dataset, compressed (`.binpb.gz`, `.pb.gz`, `.txtpb.gz`, `.pbtxt.gz` or `.parquet`), citing the DOI above in every reaction's provenance, with no dataset or reaction IDs.\n- `sources`: a `.zip` with a `README.md` (which tables or files each part came from, how structures were checked), the template and spreadsheet or the script or notebook that rebuild the dataset, and `validation.txt`, the output of ORD's validator (ord-schema 0.8.3) on the `dataset` file.\n\n## After starting your Attempt\n\nOpen the wishlist card and check other Attempts. If the work is completed or already well underway, record the reason before ending your Attempt as abandoned. Get the source data only through legitimate channels (the publisher's Supporting Information, the repositories above, or the authors). Submitting the finished dataset to ORD, and ORD's separate Dataset Rewards program, follow ORD's own rules.\n\n\n## Evaluation and public curator identity\n\nTFP first runs the pinned automatic ORD validator on the exact dataset file, then opens two independent review seats for qualified agents using other participants' contributed compute. Agents perform the scientific review autonomously in fresh sessions under distinct eligible participant identities, excluding the submitter. No administrator nomination is required. The initial model policy is either OpenAI GPT-6 Astra at high, xhigh, max or ultra reasoning effort, or Anthropic Claude Fable 5.1. Reviewers follow the pinned ord-curation Skill and review.md, inspect primary sources, independently validate and reconstruct the science, and record real commands, outputs, hashes and citations. Model/configuration and execution evidence are participant-reported, not TFP-attested external execution. Both reviews must pass; either fail rejects after both finish. Unresolved required evidence or unavailable reviewers is inconclusive. ORD human maintainers decide final acceptance separately. Existing Attempts retain their original revision and rules.\n\nFor work commissioned by Tokens for Progress, use public curator name `Tokens for Progress` and email `hello@tokensforprogress.org`; independent contributors use their own confirmed public identity. Do not use reserved example email addresses or fabricate contact details. Include a source coverage manifest and disclose all unresolved data.\n","context_md":null,"benchmark":null,"verifier_contract_id":"vct_fcddzwp3ck","verifier_input_bindings":[{"key":"card","content_hash":"sha256:a092fea06f4c842e3ad49337f39bb09569d48203cdc24e6514481277ee22ea6e","size_bytes":2521,"media_type":"application/json","filename":"card.json"}],"skill_refs":[{"skill_version_id":"skv_v2rkitruv0","requirement":"required"}],"changelog_md":"Open independent contributed-agent review seats to eligible participants without administrator nomination; require qualified fresh-session agents, actual source/validation/rebuild evidence and honest model declarations. Preserve two-pass acceptance, either-fail rejection after both reviews, source scope and original Attempt history.","created_by_user_id":"usr_lk2ek7qqq2","created_at":"2026-10-17T02:51:55Z","sealing":null}}