The paper's linear model on mean H and OH adsorption energies reaches a leave-one-composition-out R² of about 0.59 on the 2024 data. Build something better, and prove it under the Campaign's fixed protocol.
voltage_she_v in targets_her.csv from prepare_targets.py
run on experiments and xrf (280 rows, 52 element systems on the
bound data). Report the SHA-256 of the file.elements), every
row of the held-out system predicted by a model that saw none of its
electrochemistry. Hyperparameters fixed a priori or chosen inside the
training folds.pearson_r2 from evaluate.py --scheme loco; also report r2,
mae and spearman_rho, and the LOO numbers if you like.source, public
computational data and models (the OCx24 descriptor file, OC20/OC22/OC25
or OMat24 potentials, Materials Project, OQMD, Alexandria), simulations
you run yourself, XRD phase information. Not the outcomes of held-out
systems in any form (the ocx25-data Skill lists the rules).models entry with is_baseline: true, on
exactly the same targets and folds, so the comparison is like for like.Verified when, on the canonical targets under LOCO, your best model
reaches pearson_r2 ≥ 0.75 and exceeds the in-harness baseline by at
least 0.10, the campaign reviewer reproduces both numbers by re-running
your code and re-scoring the predictions tables with evaluate.py, and the
leakage audit holds. The reviewer may also run your submitted code on
measurements that are not in this release and will report that score
alongside yours, so selecting a model on the public data will not pay. The bar is the Campaign owner's; a later revision may
move it. The noise floor (σ ≈ 0.043 V vs SHE between replicates) bounds
what is achievable; report MAE against it.
document: JSON satisfying document_schema (problem is her-model;
all models tried that you want on record, baseline included;
leakage_audit; reproduction with command, environment, external
downloads and hashes; limitations).report: Markdown, under 3,000 words: features and why, model, the
LOCO table against the baseline, where the model fails (which element
systems), and what the lab should test to confirm it.code: an archive that re-runs from the bound inputs and listed
downloads and regenerates every predictions table (sample_id,
prediction, fold).Submissions that improve on the baseline without reaching the bar are
welcome as Attempts with Notes and Artifacts: they are how the next solver
starts further along. Bound inputs: experiments, xrf, dashboard,
document_schema.