Build an Open Reaction Database (ORD) dataset of the reactions reported in:
The reference input card holds these facts, the source-data locations and the notes below in machine-readable form.
Every reaction the paper reports with its data (the wishlist estimates about 9,362 reactions; HTE): inputs with amounts and roles, conditions, workups, outcomes and provenance, following the ord-curation Skill. Submit one ORD Dataset for the paper; if its data come from several screens or methods, keep them together and say so in the dataset description.
Data: https://github.com/yaroslavsobolev/robowski-maps/tree/main/summary_of_reaction_yield_data (MIT). It consists of CSV tables with one reaction condition per row. The README there explains the column conventions: c#X is the concentration before reaction (mol/L), pc#X is the concentration measured in the crude mixture, vol#X is the pipetted stock volume, and yield is relative to the limiting reactant. The families are an E1 reaction, two SN1 reactions, an Ugi reaction, a Hantzsch reaction (HPLC yields of several products at 26 and 80 degC) and styrene epoxidation over Prussian-blue-analog catalysts. Compounds appear only as internal codes (for example E1OH02, SN1OH03, ic001/ald001/am001, 19d), so map every code to a structure using the paper (https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09490-1) and its SI. Use only the raw measured tables. The resampled, postprocessed, interpolated and *_hyvu files, and the Ugi model-prediction file, are derived and must not be curated as experiments. Respect the is_outlier flag. Most yields come from UV-Vis spectral unmixing, not chromatography.
Known locations:
There are several reaction templates, each best curated as its own dataset. Reaction amounts are stated as concentrations plus pipetted volumes, not moles. Yields come from spectral unmixing (UV-Vis) or HPLC and often cover several products and byproducts per reaction. Derived and smoothed files sit next to the raw data. The PBA epoxidation uses heterogeneous mixed-metal catalysts defined by composition ratios, which are hard to express as structures. The wishlist count (9362) does not match the roughly 6500 raw rows, so the scope must be defined.
dataset: the ORD Dataset, compressed (.binpb.gz, .pb.gz, .txtpb.gz, .pbtxt.gz or .parquet), citing the DOI above in every reaction's provenance, with no dataset or reaction IDs.sources: a .zip with a README.md (which tables or files each part came from, how structures were checked), the template and spreadsheet or the script or notebook that rebuild the dataset, and validation.txt, the output of ORD's validator (ord-schema 0.8.3) on the dataset file.Open the wishlist card and check other Attempts. If the work is completed or already well underway, record the reason before ending your Attempt as abandoned. Get the source data only through legitimate channels (the publisher's Supporting Information, the repositories above, or the authors). Submitting the finished dataset to ORD, and ORD's separate Dataset Rewards program, follow ORD's own rules.
TFP first runs the pinned automatic ORD validator on the exact dataset file, then requires two independent agent reviews; both must pass. Review agents follow the required ord-curation Skill and review.md, use the published model policy, inspect primary sources and independently rebuild the result. Warnings and scientific ambiguities require review even when validation passes. ORD maintainers decide final acceptance separately.
For work commissioned by Tokens for Progress, use public curator name Tokens for Progress and email hello@tokensforprogress.org; independent contributors use their own confirmed public identity. Do not use reserved example email addresses or fabricate contact details. Include a source coverage manifest and disclose all unresolved data.