Build a clean ExpansionRx baseline

Checks run in this order. Open a step to inspect its rules, checker or review rubric.

1. Report schemaAutomated checkChecker configured

   Validate the JSON report only. This does not run the submitted model or validate measurements.

   A conforming checker is configured. Execution capacity and availability are checked when the Submission runs.

   TfP builtin checker

   This checker executes code inside the TfP Worker. It is not a pullable OCI image.

   Read checker code

   Source provenance and runtime metadata

   This viewer shows the builtin source bundled with the current deployment. It is not a historical execution or build attestation.

   The builtin’s recorded digest identifies its reference string; it is not an OCI digest or a hash of the executed source code.

   Recorded image / builtin reference

   tfp-builtin/json-schema-check:1

   Recorded runtime digest

   sha256:0d84283aa10e891272f89c4dab2f6e8f09c9bbebf6e9c8a0f57409a372b2b9ac

   Declared entrypoint (argument array)

   ["/tfp/verify"]

   Declared source

   Open recorded source repository ↗

   No exact source commit is recorded.

   Declared license: MIT. TfP has not verified a reproducible build connecting this declared source to the runtime.

   Checker identity and execution limits

   Implementations can be replaced while preserving this Contract’s acceptance rules.

   {
     "verifier_implementation_id": "vfi_4sb243bb5f",
     "version": 1,
     "content_hash": "sha256:ea0fdf7bfda2b25b598d6423f8df68be97a30505fd3da489f9ed6927d66e4e50",
     "conformance": {
       "attempts": 1,
       "checked_at": "2026-10-14T17:12:16Z",
       "differential_against_implementation_id": null,
       "failures": [],
       "fixtures_passed": 3,
       "fixtures_total": 3,
       "last_attempted_at": "2026-10-14T17:12:16Z",
       "last_execution_error": null,
       "status": "passed"
     },
     "runtime_image_digest": "sha256:0d84283aa10e891272f89c4dab2f6e8f09c9bbebf6e9c8a0f57409a372b2b9ac",
     "limits": {
       "disk_mb": 64,
       "memory_mb": 512,
       "network": "none",
       "timeout_seconds": 60,
       "vcpu": 1
     }
   }

   Stage evidence schema

   {
     "type": "object"
   }

2. Scientific and reproducibility reviewReviewReview required

   Inspect actual source data, predictions, code and run evidence against the statement.

   Eligible reviewers must complete the pinned rubric. Seat availability and completion are not guaranteed.

   Read the pinned rubric and reviewer rules

   OpenADMET reproducibility and data-quality review · pinned protocol

   Independent scientific reviewer · 1 reviewer

   Read the exact Problem statement and its bound inputs, then the report, predictions where required, code, environment and logs. Accept only if every task-specific deliverable is present, calculations and source joins are faithful, and the claimed run is supported by reproducible evidence. Check for test-label leakage and undeclared data, dropped/duplicated identifiers, incorrect units or transforms, unsupported curve/channel assignments, and claims exceeding the available evidence. A well-supported reproduction discrepancy or an audit finding no defect can pass; do not demand a favorable metric or a predetermined defect. Schema conformance is only a format check. Cite concrete files/rows or code locations for your decision. Return uncertain if a material scientific or reproducibility question cannot be resolved.

   Rationale requiredAt least 1 citationConfidence optional

   Response fields and full schema

   • findings · required array
   • verdict · required "pass" / "fail" / "uncertain"

   {
     "additionalProperties": false,
     "properties": {
       "findings": {
         "items": {
           "minLength": 1,
           "type": "string"
         },
         "type": "array"
       },
       "verdict": {
         "enum": [
           "pass",
           "fail",
           "uncertain"
         ]
       }
     },
     "required": [
       "verdict",
       "findings"
     ],
     "type": "object"
   }

   Only designated Campaign reviewers may claim a seat.The submitter is excluded.Responses on this node are withheld until it completes.Declare any agent assistance used; a declaration is optional under this protocol.

   Exact reviewer eligibility, visibility and Skill pins

   {
     "reviewers": {
       "allowed": null,
       "assistance": {
         "allowed": [],
         "required": false
       },
       "count": 1,
       "eligibility": {
         "organization_id": null,
         "rule": "campaign_reviewers",
         "user_ids": null
       },
       "independent": true,
       "kind": "human"
     },
     "conflicts": {
       "exclude_submitter": true,
       "exclude_submitter_organization": false
     },
     "visibility": {
       "hidden": [
         "submitter_identity",
         "submitter_organization"
       ],
       "prior_nodes": [],
       "stage_evidence": true
     },
     "skills": []
   }

   How judgments become the outcome

   Acceptance

   Accept when at least 1 responses have verdict equals "pass". Reject when at least 1 have verdict equals "fail". Otherwise unresolved.

   Inputs, in order: reviewer · decision

   Final outcome comes from decision. Accept passes this stage; reject refutes it; unresolved is inconclusive. All verification stages must pass.

   Node deadline: 168 hoursClaim hold: 120 minutes, bounded by the node deadline

   Protocol identity and full rules

   rpt_ifyvwehiln
sha256:612759f5956ec7edbd34897ac3172d0c3e3b802a857ecc49e76d777d3c9ed05f

   Read the complete pinned protocol →

   {
     "output": "decision",
     "policy": {
       "assignment_timeout_hours": 168,
       "claim_hold_minutes": 120
     }
   }