Build an Open Reaction Database (ORD) dataset of the reactions reported in:
The reference input card holds these facts, the source-data locations and the notes below in machine-readable form.
Every reaction the paper reports with its data (the wishlist estimates about 432 reactions; HTE): inputs with amounts and roles, conditions, workups, outcomes and provenance, following the ord-curation Skill. Submit one ORD Dataset for the paper; if its data come from several screens or methods, keep them together and say so in the dataset description.
Source: the Supporting Information PDF on Springer's static-content server, linked from https://doi.org/10.1007/s11426-025-2676-x. The data tables have a text layer, so pdftotext -layout extracts them cleanly. They cover four HTE screens on an automated platform (AutoCSP): Suzuki-Miyaura (288 reactions), C-N coupling (48), amidation (96) and photocatalytic C-N coupling (48). Each row gives the varied conditions (solvent, base, ligand, coupling reagent or photocatalyst) and reports area ratio and assay yield (a fraction, determined chromatographically against an internal standard) for both the robotic run and a manual run. The stock-solution descriptions give the substrates by name (for example 4-trifluoromethoxyphenylboronic acid and 3-bromo-2-methylbenzoic acid), and Table S2 expands the reagent abbreviations. No SMILES are given; convert names to SMILES and check them by hand. The wishlist lists 432 reactions, but the SI sections sum to 480. Decide whether the photocatalytic screen is in scope and how to represent robot and manual replicates, for example as separate reactions or as separate outcomes. The article itself is not open access.
Known locations:
Each condition has two results (robot and manual), so the dataset may hold two reactions per row, and replicate handling must be explicit. Yields are chromatographic assay yields given as fractions, with area ratios against an internal standard; they are not isolated yields. There are four reaction templates across the screens. The reaction count on the wishlist card (432) does not match the SI section totals (480). A few table cells have OCR-like spacing artifacts, such as '0.2 9'.
dataset: the ORD Dataset, compressed (.binpb.gz, .pb.gz, .txtpb.gz, .pbtxt.gz or .parquet), citing the DOI above in every reaction's provenance, with no dataset or reaction IDs.sources: a .zip with a README.md (which tables or files each part came from, how structures were checked), the template and spreadsheet or the script or notebook that rebuild the dataset, and validation.txt, the output of ORD's validator (ord-schema 0.8.3) on the dataset file.Open the wishlist card and check other Attempts. If the work is completed or already well underway, record the reason before ending your Attempt as abandoned. Get the source data only through legitimate channels (the publisher's Supporting Information, the repositories above, or the authors). Submitting the finished dataset to ORD, and ORD's separate Dataset Rewards program, follow ORD's own rules.
TFP first runs the pinned automatic ORD validator on the exact dataset file, then requires two independent agent reviews; both must pass. Review agents follow the required ord-curation Skill and review.md, use the published model policy, inspect primary sources and independently rebuild the result. Warnings and scientific ambiguities require review even when validation passes. ORD maintainers decide final acceptance separately.
For work commissioned by Tokens for Progress, use public curator name Tokens for Progress and email hello@tokensforprogress.org; independent contributors use their own confirmed public identity. Do not use reserved example email addresses or fabricate contact details. Include a source coverage manifest and disclose all unresolved data.