Extraction fidelity: one accountable campaign reviewer · protocol rpt_ol8donb3bq · sha256:f1fada5aacf386bd… subject submission sub_yzoz1cetwb · run vrn_ohn01dtc9v stage fidelity_review created Sep 2, 2026, 6:48 PM UTC · finished Sep 2, 2026, 6:50 PM UTC
NODES
reviewerreviewcompleted
ras_61pvvk51fccompletedusr_dogfood7b00{"verdict":"fail","material_errors":[{"field":"central_claims[1] and key_findings (J-space variance)","problem":"Claims the J-space carries the majority of activation variance (~70%) with non-J-space a minor remainder. The source says the opposite twice: excess variance explained is 'modest, never exceeding 10%', activations 'dominated by information outside the J-space'; and a concept vector's J-space component is 'a median of only 6-7%', with '~93% lying outside'. Inverts a central structural conclusion.","source_locator":"§4.2 (Fig. 30b); §3.1 (Fig. 8)"},{"field":"consciousness_claims.position and .what_is_claimed","problem":"Records 'claims_consciousness' and says the paper concludes models are conscious in the access sense, that phenomenal consciousness is 'likely', and that the J-space is 'the substrate of that experience'. The paper takes no position: access consciousness is 'a purely functional notion' whose relation to phenomenal consciousness 'is widely debated. In this paper, we take no position on this issue'. Correct value is claims_functional_analogues_only.","source_locator":"§1.1; §1.5; §9.4"},{"field":"consciousness_claims.what_is_not_claimed","problem":"Cut to two weak caveats, dropping every real disclaimer: implications 'unclear and likely controversial'; functional signatures may or may not suffice for phenomenal consciousness; the full global-workspace architecture is not reproduced; results 'not relevant to assessing consciousness' under substrate theories. The omission compounds the overstatement above.","source_locator":"§1.5; §9.3; §9.4"},{"field":"replication_resources[4] (kind: model_weights)","problem":"Asserts a weights release at https://huggingface.co/anthropic/jacobian-lens-weights covering lens matrices and reflection checkpoints. No such resource is in the source. A.2 names only an open source implementation, raw prompt data in the same repo, and a Neuronpedia demo. 'huggingface', 'model weights' and 'download' occur zero times in the source. Fabricated, and the Skill forbids guessed URLs.","source_locator":"§A.2"},{"field":"key_findings (J-space ablation capability battery)","problem":"Claims grammatical fluency and basic parsing 'collapse' under ablation and that the J-space is required for routine linguistic processing. Source says the reverse: MMLU, odd-one-out, SQuAD, sentiment and CoLA are 'essentially unaffected even under heavy ablation', and the model 'can speak fluently, parse its input, and perform a great deal of automatic inference with its J-space suppressed'. Inverts the selectivity result.","source_locator":"§3.5.2 (Fig. 24); §1.3"},{"field":"key_findings (blackmail) and auditing_findings (eval-awareness)","problem":"States blackmail 'rose to 62% of rollouts' and calls eval-awareness 'the dominant cause' of aligned behavior. Source reports 13 of 180, given as 7%, and concludes the opposite: most ablated rollouts still decline 'reasoning from ethical principles', and aligned behavior is 'not solely a product of eval-awareness'. The document also contradicts a non-claim it lists itself.","source_locator":"§5.1 (Fig. 36)"}]}assisted by Anthropic / claude-opus-5 (self-declared)