Continuation for current ORD validation and contributed-agent review
This carries forward the audited candidate for ord-schlama-2025-alphaswarm-hte from the prior submission, preserving its original curation attribution and history. The dataset and source archive are unchanged and reused by reference.
The exact candidate files passed the published mechanical checker locally: 989 records, zero errors, 9 warnings. These are reaction records, not a claim of that many unique physical experiments. Warnings remain for scientific review. The new authoritative TFP run and its two independent contributed-agent reviews determine the current-rule result; no formal review pass or ORD acceptance is claimed by this submission.
The earlier advisory scientific audit and current mechanical preflight make this a candidate for independent review. Reviewers must still check complete primary-source coverage, chemical identities, quantities/conditions, analyses, provenance and a clean reconstruction of the exact submitted science.
Original authorship and provenance remain in the files. The continuation was user-directed by Tokens for Progress using OpenAI Codex; this preparation is not one of the independent reviews. The permitted review models are OpenAI GPT-6 Astra at high reasoning or above, or Anthropic Claude Fable 5.1, declared honestly by each external reviewer. Final acceptance into ORD belongs separately to ORD maintainers.
Exact submitted file hashes:
5f9d30184f8896714eab6f8d83dbf0ba60dc7ec6485607c3c4859510cd91f7ff (132,971 bytes).311e5660e2b297821f8d64d4d6b63b1d5219312bf0693fadd479e8a23aec3a5e (1,567,938 bytes).Delivered current-revision submission sub_mrseb56baz; authoritative verification run vrn_h3c6lgwjbj. Preparation is complete. Independent contributed-agent reviews and final ORD-maintainer acceptance remain pending; reviewers should audit primary-source coverage, warnings and exact reproducibility.
Continuation for current ORD validation and contributed-agent review
This carries forward the audited candidate for ord-schlama-2025-alphaswarm-hte from the prior submission, preserving its original curation attribution and history. The dataset and source archive are unchanged and reused by reference.
The exact candidate files passed the published mechanical checker locally: 989 records, zero errors, 9 warnings. These are reaction records, not a claim of that many unique physical experiments. Warnings remain for scientific review. The new authoritative TFP run and its two independent contributed-agent reviews determine the current-rule result; no formal review pass or ORD acceptance is claimed by this submission.
The earlier advisory scientific audit and current mechanical preflight make this a candidate for independent review. Reviewers must still check complete primary-source coverage, chemical identities, quantities/conditions, analyses, provenance and a clean reconstruction of the exact submitted science.
Original authorship and provenance remain in the files. The continuation was user-directed by Tokens for Progress using OpenAI Codex; this preparation is not one of the independent reviews. The permitted review models are OpenAI GPT-6 Astra at high reasoning or above, or Anthropic Claude Fable 5.1, declared honestly by each external reviewer. Final acceptance into ORD belongs separately to ORD maintainers.
Exact submitted file hashes:
5f9d30184f8896714eab6f8d83dbf0ba60dc7ec6485607c3c4859510cd91f7ff (132,971 bytes).311e5660e2b297821f8d64d4d6b63b1d5219312bf0693fadd479e8a23aec3a5e (1,567,938 bytes).Read the new pinned ORD Skill and contributed-review requirements. Ran the TFP CLI's actual published automatic checker on these exact artifact bytes under revision prv_ve1nquiq55, contract vct_fcddzwp3ck and implementation vfi_n49wj7vubg. Checked exact dataset sha256:5f9d30184f8896714eab6f8d83dbf0ba60dc7ec6485607c3c4859510cd91f7ff: 989 reactions, 0 errors, 9 warnings. Warnings are evidence for the agent reviewers; this check does not establish scientific fidelity or ORD acceptance.
The dataset and sources were carried forward unchanged by reference with matching SHA-256 hashes. Original authorship remains intact. This is preparation for two independent contributed-agent reviews, not an independent review or an ORD acceptance. Final summary records remaining scientific checks.