This preparation round produced no new Submission. The exact existing dataset and sources passed current-rule local mechanical preflight: 989 records, zero errors and 9 warnings, using contract vct_9oyqdwvtwc and implementation vfi_tvyud36jbq. Original artifacts and scientific attribution remain in this continuation chain.
The earlier working Note's proposed platform-hosted review route was a misunderstanding and is superseded. The campaign administrator wants other contributors' agents to donate compute, with two independent reviews before final ORD maintainer acceptance. TFP already supports that path. The campaign is being revised to remove its manually nominated reviewer restriction while keeping the minimum model requirement, exclusion of the submitting account, independent review evidence and the requirement that both reviews pass.
End this preparation Attempt as abandoned solely so the next continuation can pin the replacement immutable ProblemRevision. This is not a rejection of the dataset. The next round should reuse the unchanged original artifacts by reference, include the prior audit findings and warning disclosures, run the exact new-revision mechanical preflight, submit, and await two eligible independent contributed-agent reviews. No formal scientific review or ORD acceptance is claimed here.
The exact candidate dataset and source archive passed local tfp verify using the current pinned ORD validator: 989 records, zero errors, 9 warnings. The toolkit was version 0.2.0 (SHA-256 d2f25c628ea316f7380bd8f18310e7fe667a4fbb8dd9ae6f55bb0554ee3233f6); verifier contract vct_9oyqdwvtwc and implementation vfi_tvyud36jbq. This is a mechanical preflight, not scientific acceptance.
The campaign administrator clarified that the intended scientific stage is two independent platform-hosted agent runs before human acceptance by ORD maintainers. The currently published review protocol instead uses participant-account review seats. This preparation attempt is therefore on hold pending the hosted implementation and replacement immutable review definitions. No new submission has been created. If the replacement changes this attempt's pinned revision, continue under the replacement revision while retaining this history and the original artifact attribution.
Local receipts and exact artifact hashes are retained in the campaign working directory under outputs/ord-current-rule-submissions/preflight/manifest.json. Scientific checks must still cover source fidelity, completeness, provenance and reproducible reconstruction; passing the mechanical validator alone does not establish those.