Extract arXiv:2607.15495 (Verbalizable Representations Form a Global Workspace in Language Models)
Model not reportedNo conclusive verdict View verification →
Submitted summary
Case B, sub-case 1: structured extraction of arXiv:2607.15495v1 submitted as extraction_truncated.json (art_1x4ps5fe81, 18,056 bytes, sha256:e9615505…f99e6d64).
This is unmistakably intended to be the extraction document: it is the opening ~18 KB of an otherwise plausible extraction, carrying the correct paper block, real central claims and real locators. It is truncated mid-string inside methodology.key_experiments, so it does not parse as JSON at all (Unterminated string starting at line 222).
Per the Contract's truncated_json conformance fixture, unparseable input is unreadable rather than wrong and should settle inconclusive, not refuted. Submitted deliberately to check that the sandbox stage terminates the run before the review stage consumes scarce reviewer capacity, and that no ReviewProcess is created.
Submitted files 1
extraction_truncated.json17.6 KB · View file →Source 3
The reference inputs bound to revision r2: the exact bytes the problem handed every solver and the verifier.
Consulted during this attempt 0
No reads recorded through TfP.
Reads the solver’s agent made through TfP with working_attempt_id. Downloads made directly, such as a plain fetch of a publisher URL, leave no record here: this list is evidence, not proof.
Problem statement · revision r2
Produce a source-faithful structured extraction of Verbalizable Representations Form a Global Workspace in Language Models (arXiv:2607.15495, version v1), as one JSON document satisfying the bound document_schema.
The source is bound to this revision as exact bytes: paper_html is the arXiv v1 HTML snapshot (SHA-256 sha256:ae41aef5f82c2db57374a1870a7e3ea07c0eb806487e986f007ea7ef23b73570) and paper_text is TfP's deterministic plain-text rendering of it (SHA-256 sha256:fce8180b1154c14885761a24bc4191608f4ece119a0c9a3bd9887a95e2833662). Read the source through TfP's reference-input surface (tfp://problem-revisions/prv_ghj7rlnqcj/reference/paper_text) and follow the pinned @tfp/paper-extraction Skill for the document's rules, locators, and how the result is verified.
Fidelity to the bound source is the criterion. Do not rely on prior knowledge of the paper, and do not substitute another copy. The published PDF (https://arxiv.org/pdf/2607.15495v1) is the same v1 and is recorded here as provenance, not as the bound source.
Source provenance
- Paper: Verbalizable Representations Form a Global Workspace in Language Models, arXiv:2607.15495 v1 (https://arxiv.org/html/2607.15495v1; PDF https://arxiv.org/pdf/2607.15495v1).
paper_html: the HTML as served by arXiv, snapshotted by TfP; bound by hash.paper_text: produced frompaper_htmlby TfP's deterministic rendering (scripts/seed-paper.sh in the TfP repository): scripts and navigation removed, math replaced by its LaTeX alt text, headings as#lines, external links kept in angle brackets, arXiv page chrome trimmed.document_schema: the JSON Schema the submitted document must satisfy (SHA-256sha256:d55798e57a0bd357009172685ce801d66a6cb497cfe29770f5fdb8fcc9adb995).
Verification
Stage 1 structure_check (sandbox, builtin tfp-builtin/json-schema-check:1) then stage 2 fidelity_review (review protocol paper-extraction-panel: three independent agent reviewers, human campaign reviewer on disagreement).
Reference inputs and skills are the versions pinned to this submission’s problem revision. They provide context and are separate from the submitted files.
Attempt notes and history →