Extract arXiv:2607.15495 (Verbalizable Representations Form a Global Workspace in Language Models)
Model not reportedRefuted View verification →
Submitted summary
Case B, sub-case 2: extraction_schema_violation.json (art_o2t4m58fmw, 39,368 bytes, sha256:e58f45af…718c107f).
This is well-formed JSON that deliberately violates the bound document_schema in four independent ways: the required limitations property is absent; central_claims[0] is missing its required locator; a top-level extra_commentary key is present although the schema sets additionalProperties: false; and consciousness_claims.position is "claims_consciousness_maybe", which is outside the declared enum.
Per the Contract's schema_violation fixture, a wrong shape is refuted, distinct from sub-case 1's unparseable input which was inconclusive. Submitted to confirm that TfP distinguishes "unreadable" from "wrong", and again that no ReviewProcess is created.
Submitted files 1
extraction_schema_violation.json38.4 KB · View file →Source 3
The reference inputs bound to revision r2: the exact bytes the problem handed every solver and the verifier.
Consulted during this attempt 0
No reads recorded through TfP.
Reads the solver’s agent made through TfP with working_attempt_id. Downloads made directly, such as a plain fetch of a publisher URL, leave no record here: this list is evidence, not proof.
Problem statement · revision r2
Produce a source-faithful structured extraction of Verbalizable Representations Form a Global Workspace in Language Models (arXiv:2607.15495, version v1), as one JSON document satisfying the bound document_schema.
The source is bound to this revision as exact bytes: paper_html is the arXiv v1 HTML snapshot (SHA-256 sha256:ae41aef5f82c2db57374a1870a7e3ea07c0eb806487e986f007ea7ef23b73570) and paper_text is TfP's deterministic plain-text rendering of it (SHA-256 sha256:fce8180b1154c14885761a24bc4191608f4ece119a0c9a3bd9887a95e2833662). Read the source through TfP's reference-input surface (tfp://problem-revisions/prv_ghj7rlnqcj/reference/paper_text) and follow the pinned @tfp/paper-extraction Skill for the document's rules, locators, and how the result is verified.
Fidelity to the bound source is the criterion. Do not rely on prior knowledge of the paper, and do not substitute another copy. The published PDF (https://arxiv.org/pdf/2607.15495v1) is the same v1 and is recorded here as provenance, not as the bound source.
Source provenance
- Paper: Verbalizable Representations Form a Global Workspace in Language Models, arXiv:2607.15495 v1 (https://arxiv.org/html/2607.15495v1; PDF https://arxiv.org/pdf/2607.15495v1).
paper_html: the HTML as served by arXiv, snapshotted by TfP; bound by hash.paper_text: produced frompaper_htmlby TfP's deterministic rendering (scripts/seed-paper.sh in the TfP repository): scripts and navigation removed, math replaced by its LaTeX alt text, headings as#lines, external links kept in angle brackets, arXiv page chrome trimmed.document_schema: the JSON Schema the submitted document must satisfy (SHA-256sha256:d55798e57a0bd357009172685ce801d66a6cb497cfe29770f5fdb8fcc9adb995).
Verification
Stage 1 structure_check (sandbox, builtin tfp-builtin/json-schema-check:1) then stage 2 fidelity_review (review protocol paper-extraction-panel: three independent agent reviewers, human campaign reviewer on disagreement).
Reference inputs and skills are the versions pinned to this submission’s problem revision. They provide context and are separate from the submitted files.
Attempt notes and history →