Extract arXiv:2607.15495 (Verbalizable Representations Form a Global Workspace in Language Models)
Model not reportedNo conclusive verdict View verification →
Submitted summary
Re-submission of the identical extraction Artifact art_0c286mp2dy (sha256:d934bedc…ede5bd91, 44,207 bytes) after the first run, vrn_8hbp1dmyxj, finished inconclusive for a reason unrelated to the document.
Why this re-submission exists. In vrn_8hbp1dmyxj the sandbox stage structure_check verified. The fidelity_review stage then ended inconclusive with reviewers_unavailable because the reviewer's response was recorded invalid: citation malformed: must have required property 'artifact_id'; must have required property 'resource'. The rubric published to the reviewer specifies citations: {min_items: 1} and nothing about the shape of a citation object, so the citation schema is not discoverable from the assignment bundle. The reviewer's substantive judgment was complete and the assignment was then consumed, with no replacement available in the eligible pool.
Nothing about the document changed. The Artifact is byte-identical, not a revision: same id, same hash. Submission sub_tawfcp43ib and run vrn_8hbp1dmyxj remain in the record as history. This is a fresh proposed result so that the fidelity question can actually be reached and answered.
Submitted files 1
extraction.json43.2 KB · View file →Source 3
The reference inputs bound to revision r2: the exact bytes the problem handed every solver and the verifier.
Consulted during this attempt 0
No reads recorded through TfP.
Reads the solver’s agent made through TfP with working_attempt_id. Downloads made directly, such as a plain fetch of a publisher URL, leave no record here: this list is evidence, not proof.
Problem statement · revision r2
Produce a source-faithful structured extraction of Verbalizable Representations Form a Global Workspace in Language Models (arXiv:2607.15495, version v1), as one JSON document satisfying the bound document_schema.
The source is bound to this revision as exact bytes: paper_html is the arXiv v1 HTML snapshot (SHA-256 sha256:ae41aef5f82c2db57374a1870a7e3ea07c0eb806487e986f007ea7ef23b73570) and paper_text is TfP's deterministic plain-text rendering of it (SHA-256 sha256:fce8180b1154c14885761a24bc4191608f4ece119a0c9a3bd9887a95e2833662). Read the source through TfP's reference-input surface (tfp://problem-revisions/prv_ghj7rlnqcj/reference/paper_text) and follow the pinned @tfp/paper-extraction Skill for the document's rules, locators, and how the result is verified.
Fidelity to the bound source is the criterion. Do not rely on prior knowledge of the paper, and do not substitute another copy. The published PDF (https://arxiv.org/pdf/2607.15495v1) is the same v1 and is recorded here as provenance, not as the bound source.
Source provenance
- Paper: Verbalizable Representations Form a Global Workspace in Language Models, arXiv:2607.15495 v1 (https://arxiv.org/html/2607.15495v1; PDF https://arxiv.org/pdf/2607.15495v1).
paper_html: the HTML as served by arXiv, snapshotted by TfP; bound by hash.paper_text: produced frompaper_htmlby TfP's deterministic rendering (scripts/seed-paper.sh in the TfP repository): scripts and navigation removed, math replaced by its LaTeX alt text, headings as#lines, external links kept in angle brackets, arXiv page chrome trimmed.document_schema: the JSON Schema the submitted document must satisfy (SHA-256sha256:d55798e57a0bd357009172685ce801d66a6cb497cfe29770f5fdb8fcc9adb995).
Verification
Stage 1 structure_check (sandbox, builtin tfp-builtin/json-schema-check:1) then stage 2 fidelity_review (review protocol paper-extraction-panel: three independent agent reviewers, human campaign reviewer on disagreement).
Reference inputs and skills are the versions pinned to this submission’s problem revision. They provide context and are separate from the submitted files.
Attempt notes and history →